>  by Fred Marshall Jr.
>  January 31, 2008
>  
>  Hypothetically suppose, in a presidential  election
> year, the Democratic Party were to nominate a Muslim
> extremist  and the Republican Party were to nominate
> a Marxist Communist as their  candidates, both
> determined to weaken the country and prepare it for
> political  and economic collapse, thus compelling us
> to submit to one-world global  rule as the only way
> for our society to survive.
>  
>  Further suppose that the candidate you really
> like, one genuinely committed to saving the country,
> were running as a  third-party candidate.  Imagine
> the media had persuaded you that he didn’t  stand a
> snowball’s chance in hell of being elected, and that
> a vote for him  would be, in effect, a vote for one
> of the other two.  Would you vote for  your man on
> principle and hope for the best, or would you vote
> for the Muslim or  the Marxist, whichever one you
> consider the lesser of  two evils?
>  
>  Should you have chosen the latter, then the
> master-illusionists mainstream media would have been
> the determining factor  in your choice. 
>  
>  "Network" the Movie – 1976 (4 minute  excerpt)
> http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=MTN3s2iVKKI

>  
>
>  They would have manipulated you  by persuading you
> to abandon your principled preference to vote for
> the candidate they cleverly but subtly promoted.
> Then you would not  have been a person who thinks
> for him/herself, but a gullible, impressionable
> lackey of the controlling elite.  You’d be a
> nothing, a nobody, a puppet, a  sheep, a pawn, a
> lemming, a lamb for slaughter, a vassal, a peon, and
> every bit  a fool.  Can you in clear conscience
> disagree?  You cannot.  Of  course we’re proceeding
> hypothetically here.  I know readers here are not
> fools.  The reality to be acknowledged here is that
> even very  smart people can sometimes be duped into
> foolish behavior they quickly, but too  late,
> regret.  I seek to prevent as much of that as I
> possibly  can.
>  
>  It’s in that vein that I warn you of the  dangers
> of voting for either Hillary Clinton or John McCain.
>  Both are  tools of the KGB and I’ll prove that to
> you shortly.
>  
>  There may perhaps be three million people who
> already know what you are about to learn (and you
> may already be one of them),  due mainly to
> deliberate mainstream media suppression of readily
> available  facts.  That means there are 307 million
> people, plus 30 million  illegals….a third of whom
> will vote….who DON’T know.  Think  about that for
> a moment.  That means that, with a little help from
> the  anti-American mainstream media, Satan himself
> could be elected president of this  country and you
> and I could do nothing to prevent it, though we
> might stand on  the street corner and scream at the
> top of our lungs 24/7….to no  avail.
>  
>  Hillary
>  
>  If you go back and trace Hillary’s  background,
> from her college days at Wellesley to today, you’ll
> see her repeated  concurrence with Marxist teachings
> and her written and verbal approval of  socialist
> theory in a number of past and present
> circumstances.  Her  reportedly ghost-written book,
> "It Takes a Village," is chock-full  of
> nuanced….though indelibly clear upon close
> examination….expressions and  suppositions. 
> While the actual writing is allegedly not hers, the
> book bears her name as author and that constitutes
> explicit endorsement of its  entire contents. 
>  
>  That’s only one example.  Her writings  while at
> Wellesley, particularly those regarding children,
> also reflect her  socialist leanings and convictions
> advocating state ownership of children and  state
> control of parents by law.  Some of the articles she
> penned for  the Harvard Law Journal reflect similar
> beliefs.  The same concepts were  evident in her
> failed "Clinton Health Care Program" during her
> husband’s  administration.  The Congress, a
> Democratic Congress, rejected it  before the ink was
> dry.
>  
>  Then there are the books written about her by
> people who know her, who worked closely with her at
> different times, and the  revelations those authors
> publicize, plus the ones written based upon research
>  of public domain documents.  Of the 48 published
> books written about her,  only seven are slightly
> more favorable to her than critical of her. 
> Seventeen contain a reasonably balanced assortment
> of positives and  negatives, but a whopping 24 of
> them are mostly negative and quite  censorious of
> the former first lady.
>  
>    List  of books about Hillary Rodham Clinton
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_books_about_Hillary_Rodham_Clinton
>
>
>  
>  Of all the criticisms leveled against her from  a
> variety of vantage points, the one most often
> mentioned which seems to        te her character,
> and undeniably clouds her judgment to the point of
> near  rabid blindness, is her insatiable
> vindictiveness, often based more upon  paranoia than
> reality.  In any event, when she perceives someone
> to be an  enemy, she is hell-bent on getting even,
> if they have harmed her,  or neutralizing them
> before they can do her any harm.
>  
>  Her senior honors thesis, "There is Only  the
> Fight," provides an insight to a socialist,
> bordering on  criminal, mind to which the ends
> justify the means no matter  what.  Her thesis
> reviews the works of Saul Alinsky, a role       for
> left-wing Satanists if there ever was one, and it’s
> frightening how often she  agrees with his positions
> and beliefs, a couple of which appear below in his
> quotes.
>
>     "Sometimes it seems to me that the question
> people should ask  is not "Is there life after
>      ?" but "Is there life after birth?" I don’t
> know whether there’s anything after this or not. I
> haven’t seen the evidence one  way or the other and
> I don’t think anybody else has either. But I do know
> that  man’s obsession with the question comes out of
> his stubborn refusal to face up  to his own
> mortality. Let’s say that if there is an afterlife,
> and I have  anything to say about it, I will
> unreservedly choose to go to  hell." – Saul Alinsky
>  
>      "Hell would be heaven for  me. All my life I’ve
> been with the have-nots. Over here, if you’re a
> have-not,  you’re short of dough. If you’re a
> have-not in hell, you’re short of virtue.  Once I
> get into hell, I’ll start organizing the have-nots
> over  there." – Saul  Alinsky
>  
>  Hillary Clinton is a  Socialist-Marxist-Communist
> who needn’t ever again get anywhere near the  White
> House. 
>  
>  Four former Arkansas highway  patrolmen….Steve
> Willis, Robert Williams, Conway LeBleu, and Todd
> McKeehan….who had acted as bodyguards and provided
> security for Governor and  Mrs. Clinton in Arkansas
> and during the 1992 presidential campaign, were
> brought  to Washington in 1992 to continue their
> work as bodyguards with the Secret  Service.  The
> FBI refused to clear them for that duty so they were
> given  jobs in the BATF instead. 
>  
>  Roger Altman, the number three man in Clinton’s
> Justice Department (behind Janet Reno and Webster
> Hubbell) was dispatched to  Waco to personally
> select the "assault" team for the initial attack on
> the  Branch Davidian community home (not
> "compound").  Four BATF agents  were allegedly
> killed in that assault, all falsely blamed on David
> Koresch and  the Mt. Carmel residents. Wanna guess
> who the four were?  Wanna guess at  the odds of that
> happening?  Two of them had been talking "out of
> school"  about the affair between Hillary and Vince
> Foster back in Arkansas. 
>  
>          reports show they were all killed by
> bullets to the left temple at close range.  The
> media didn’t report that,  did they?  If you listen
> to the hours and hours of audio tapes of the
> conversations between the hostage negotiator and
> David Koresch (and other  Mt.Carmel occupants) as I
> have, you’ll not hear any references during that
> period mentioning anything suggesting that (1)
> federal agents were killed or (2)  that anyone
> inside Mr. Carmel            .  But you heard it on
> the news  later.  Koresch pitched a fit when he
> heard it on television, and  vehemently denied that
> any of his people had fired at the  feds.
>  
>  Hillary is a member of the Council on  Foreign
> Relations and will gladly help them with their plans
> to merge the U.S.  with Mexico and Canada into the
> North American Union.  
>  
>   NORTH AMERICAN  UNION & VCHIP TRUTH – 9 min
>  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuBo4E77ZXo

>
>
>  
>  The target date for completion of the  unionization
> is 2012.  Woe is us if she is elected by the tens of
>  millions who vote without knowing anything about
> the candidates beyond what they  see on the
> idiot-box.  Hillary Clinton is a ruthless,
> power-hungry witch  who would like nothing better
> than to be a dictator and prove how superior she  is
> to mere mortals.
>  
>  Hillary – a dangerous demagogue  
>
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58666
>
>
>  
>  John McCain (also a CFR member, as are  Huckabee,
> Obama, Romney, Edwards, Giuliani)
>  
>  The media limn John McCain as a "war hero," a  Navy
> lighter pilot who was shot down while flying
> his 23rd mission over  North Vietnam.  He was
> captured and was a Prisoner of War for five years in
>  Hanoi, North Vietnam.  I don’t know what’s "heroic"
> about flying a     er  and being shot down.  Most
> war veterans would lament "Flying  missions was his
> JOB." 
>  
>  Not unlike John Kerry, he has stubbornly  refused
> to authorize the release of his official records.
> The two of them  together have repeatedly blocked
> Senate efforts to find or account for American  POWs
> and MIAs for going on 35 years now.  Have you never
> wondered why you  haven’t seen any Hanoi Hilton POWs
> interviewed on television and tell of their
> captivity with John McCain, who was also there?
> Some have wanted to be  publicly interviewed, and
> some have been, but not on mainstream network
> television.  McCain doesn’t want them telling the
> public that they only saw  him twice, because he
> allegedly had what they called "VIP quarters and
> special  accommodations" separate from theirs.  Some
> allege that he was never         d because he
> willingly gave the enemy information about American
> operations, flight patterns, maneuver tactics, etc.
>
>  
>  Once, I believe when Jane Fonda visited, he was
> photographed in the Navy’s dress white uniform.
> Wonder how he got that  uniform while in an enemy
> prison camp?  Surely he didn’t have it  conveniently
> hanging in the plane he was flying when he was shot
> down.
>  
>  The  True John McCain – June 2007 video interview
> with Colonel  Hopper
>
>
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_hopper_video.htm
>  
>   John  McCain: The Manchurian Candidate?
>
>
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_tedmancurin.htm
>  
>   The  War Secrets Senator John McCain Hides
>
>
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_secretworldofmccain.htm
>  
>   The media want McCain to win the nomination, so
> they can THEN (they’re "pushing" him NOW)destroy
> him and give Hillary the key to the Oral Office,
> which will immediately be  re-dubbed "The Ovary
> Office."  Either way, it will be the  KGB’s Western
> Office, as both are Communists.
>  
>  Readers, do some research of your  own.  I have
> only scratched the surface in this short  treatise.
>  
>  Soviet Premier Nikita Kruschev said, back in  the
> 1960′s, that the Soviets would conquer the United
> States without firing a  shot.  What better way to
> accomplish that than to have a KGB agent elected
> president of the United States?  Did we go through
> all those years of  the Cold War just to hand our
> country over to them on a silver  platter?
>  
>  The War in Iraq
>  
>  Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler  was
> right….war is a [profitable] racket, with the
> profit going to  mega-corporations and the cost of
> goods sold being paid for in soldiers’ lives  and
> limbs.
>  
>   Excerpt from a speech delivered in 1933, by  Major
> General Smedley Butler, USMC.   War is just a
> racket. A racket is best    described, I believe, as
> something that is not what it seems to the majority
>   of people. Only a small inside group knows what it
> is about. It is conducted    for the benefit of the
> very few at the expense of the masses.    I believe
> in adequate defense at the coastline    and nothing
> else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then
> we’ll fight. The    trouble with America is that
> when the dollar only earns 6 percent over here,  
> then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100
> percent. Then the flag    follows the dollar and the
> soldiers follow the flag.    I wouldn’t go to war
> again as I have done to    protect some lousy
> investment of the bankers. There are only two  
> things we should fight for. One is the defense of
> our homes and the other is    the Bill of Rights.
> War for any other reason is simply a racket.     
> There isn’t a trick in
>  the racketeering bag    that the military gang is
> blind to. It has its "finger men" to point out  
> enemies, its "muscle men" to destroy enemies, its
> "brain men" to plan war    preparations, and a "Big
> Boss" Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism

Have you seen this?

A Uni student asks John Kerry some difficult questions, including whether John Kerry is part of the Skull and Bones Secret Society that George Bush is a membmer of.

The Uni student was dragged away by police, held to the floor, and tazered.

You can hear some comments from John Kerry as the insicident proceeds. He doesn’t sound to phased by it.

Watch the video, listen out for when he says ‘don’t tazer me bro’.  Big buzz about it online now.

‘enjoy’ the video.

Here it is again from a different angle, in which you can hear the student say he will get up and walk out of there, before they hang cuff him, and then proeed to administer the tazer shot.

Check out Wired Magazines Coverage of ‘Don’t Tazer Me Bro’.

And here’s an interview with the head of the Uni at the newly acquired domain www.donttasemebro.com

Many YouTube videos covering this.

I’ve just found another fellow marketing man who knows about Neo-Tech.

Bill Gluth runs a marketing blog and made a post titled Discover what you love to do, in which he mentions the great Mark Hamilton of Neo-Tech Publishing.

I’ve subscribed to Bill’s rss feed and recommend anyone interested in marketing in general, and marketing freedom in particular, subscribe to Bill’s blog feed.

At some point there will be a critical mass of trained marketers with the passion of Neo-Tech and the pressure of political survival.

Big plans ahead.  Great to find you Bill.