>  by Fred Marshall Jr.
>  January 31, 2008
>  
>  Hypothetically suppose, in a presidential  election
> year, the Democratic Party were to nominate a Muslim
> extremist  and the Republican Party were to nominate
> a Marxist Communist as their  candidates, both
> determined to weaken the country and prepare it for
> political  and economic collapse, thus compelling us
> to submit to one-world global  rule as the only way
> for our society to survive.
>  
>  Further suppose that the candidate you really
> like, one genuinely committed to saving the country,
> were running as a  third-party candidate.  Imagine
> the media had persuaded you that he didn't  stand a
> snowball's chance in hell of being elected, and that
> a vote for him  would be, in effect, a vote for one
> of the other two.  Would you vote for  your man on
> principle and hope for the best, or would you vote
> for the Muslim or  the Marxist, whichever one you
> consider the lesser of  two evils?
>  
>  Should you have chosen the latter, then the
> master-illusionists mainstream media would have been
> the determining factor  in your choice. 
>  
>  "Network" the Movie – 1976 (4 minute  excerpt)
> http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=MTN3s2iVKKI

>  
>
>  They would have manipulated you  by persuading you
> to abandon your principled preference to vote for
> the candidate they cleverly but subtly promoted.
> Then you would not  have been a person who thinks
> for him/herself, but a gullible, impressionable
> lackey of the controlling elite.  You'd be a
> nothing, a nobody, a puppet, a  sheep, a pawn, a
> lemming, a lamb for slaughter, a vassal, a peon, and
> every bit  a fool.  Can you in clear conscience
> disagree?  You cannot.  Of  course we're proceeding
> hypothetically here.  I know readers here are not
> fools.  The reality to be acknowledged here is that
> even very  smart people can sometimes be duped into
> foolish behavior they quickly, but too  late,
> regret.  I seek to prevent as much of that as I
> possibly  can.
>  
>  It's in that vein that I warn you of the  dangers
> of voting for either Hillary Clinton or John McCain.
>  Both are  tools of the KGB and I'll prove that to
> you shortly.
>  
>  There may perhaps be three million people who
> already know what you are about to learn (and you
> may already be one of them),  due mainly to
> deliberate mainstream media suppression of readily
> available  facts.  That means there are 307 million
> people, plus 30 million  illegals….a third of whom
> will vote….who DON'T know.  Think  about that for
> a moment.  That means that, with a little help from
> the  anti-American mainstream media, Satan himself
> could be elected president of this  country and you
> and I could do nothing to prevent it, though we
> might stand on  the street corner and scream at the
> top of our lungs 24/7….to no  avail.
>  
>  Hillary
>  
>  If you go back and trace Hillary's  background,
> from her college days at Wellesley to today, you'll
> see her repeated  concurrence with Marxist teachings
> and her written and verbal approval of  socialist
> theory in a number of past and present
> circumstances.  Her  reportedly ghost-written book,
> "It Takes a Village," is chock-full  of
> nuanced….though indelibly clear upon close
> examination….expressions and  suppositions. 
> While the actual writing is allegedly not hers, the
> book bears her name as author and that constitutes
> explicit endorsement of its  entire contents. 
>  
>  That's only one example.  Her writings  while at
> Wellesley, particularly those regarding children,
> also reflect her  socialist leanings and convictions
> advocating state ownership of children and  state
> control of parents by law.  Some of the articles she
> penned for  the Harvard Law Journal reflect similar
> beliefs.  The same concepts were  evident in her
> failed "Clinton Health Care Program" during her
> husband's  administration.  The Congress, a
> Democratic Congress, rejected it  before the ink was
> dry.
>  
>  Then there are the books written about her by
> people who know her, who worked closely with her at
> different times, and the  revelations those authors
> publicize, plus the ones written based upon research
>  of public domain documents.  Of the 48 published
> books written about her,  only seven are slightly
> more favorable to her than critical of her. 
> Seventeen contain a reasonably balanced assortment
> of positives and  negatives, but a whopping 24 of
> them are mostly negative and quite  censorious of
> the former first lady.
>  
>    List  of books about Hillary Rodham Clinton
>
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_books_about_Hillary_Rodham_Clinton
>
>
>  
>  Of all the criticisms leveled against her from  a
> variety of vantage points, the one most often
> mentioned which seems to        te her character,
> and undeniably clouds her judgment to the point of
> near  rabid blindness, is her insatiable
> vindictiveness, often based more upon  paranoia than
> reality.  In any event, when she perceives someone
> to be an  enemy, she is hell-bent on getting even,
> if they have harmed her,  or neutralizing them
> before they can do her any harm.
>  
>  Her senior honors thesis, "There is Only  the
> Fight," provides an insight to a socialist,
> bordering on  criminal, mind to which the ends
> justify the means no matter  what.  Her thesis
> reviews the works of Saul Alinsky, a role       for
> left-wing Satanists if there ever was one, and it's
> frightening how often she  agrees with his positions
> and beliefs, a couple of which appear below in his
> quotes.
>
>     "Sometimes it seems to me that the question
> people should ask  is not "Is there life after
>      ?" but "Is there life after birth?" I don't
> know whether there's anything after this or not. I
> haven't seen the evidence one  way or the other and
> I don't think anybody else has either. But I do know
> that  man's obsession with the question comes out of
> his stubborn refusal to face up  to his own
> mortality. Let's say that if there is an afterlife,
> and I have  anything to say about it, I will
> unreservedly choose to go to  hell." – Saul Alinsky
>  
>      "Hell would be heaven for  me. All my life I've
> been with the have-nots. Over here, if you're a
> have-not,  you're short of dough. If you're a
> have-not in hell, you're short of virtue.  Once I
> get into hell, I'll start organizing the have-nots
> over  there." – Saul  Alinsky
>  
>  Hillary Clinton is a  Socialist-Marxist-Communist
> who needn't ever again get anywhere near the  White
> House. 
>  
>  Four former Arkansas highway  patrolmen….Steve
> Willis, Robert Williams, Conway LeBleu, and Todd
> McKeehan….who had acted as bodyguards and provided
> security for Governor and  Mrs. Clinton in Arkansas
> and during the 1992 presidential campaign, were
> brought  to Washington in 1992 to continue their
> work as bodyguards with the Secret  Service.  The
> FBI refused to clear them for that duty so they were
> given  jobs in the BATF instead. 
>  
>  Roger Altman, the number three man in Clinton's
> Justice Department (behind Janet Reno and Webster
> Hubbell) was dispatched to  Waco to personally
> select the "assault" team for the initial attack on
> the  Branch Davidian community home (not
> "compound").  Four BATF agents  were allegedly
> killed in that assault, all falsely blamed on David
> Koresch and  the Mt. Carmel residents. Wanna guess
> who the four were?  Wanna guess at  the odds of that
> happening?  Two of them had been talking "out of
> school"  about the affair between Hillary and Vince
> Foster back in Arkansas. 
>  
>          reports show they were all killed by
> bullets to the left temple at close range.  The
> media didn't report that,  did they?  If you listen
> to the hours and hours of audio tapes of the
> conversations between the hostage negotiator and
> David Koresch (and other  Mt.Carmel occupants) as I
> have, you'll not hear any references during that
> period mentioning anything suggesting that (1)
> federal agents were killed or (2)  that anyone
> inside Mr. Carmel            .  But you heard it on
> the news  later.  Koresch pitched a fit when he
> heard it on television, and  vehemently denied that
> any of his people had fired at the  feds.
>  
>  Hillary is a member of the Council on  Foreign
> Relations and will gladly help them with their plans
> to merge the U.S.  with Mexico and Canada into the
> North American Union.  
>  
>   NORTH AMERICAN  UNION & VCHIP TRUTH – 9 min
>  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuBo4E77ZXo

>
>
>  
>  The target date for completion of the  unionization
> is 2012.  Woe is us if she is elected by the tens of
>  millions who vote without knowing anything about
> the candidates beyond what they  see on the
> idiot-box.  Hillary Clinton is a ruthless,
> power-hungry witch  who would like nothing better
> than to be a dictator and prove how superior she  is
> to mere mortals.
>  
>  Hillary – a dangerous demagogue  
>
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58666
>
>
>  
>  John McCain (also a CFR member, as are  Huckabee,
> Obama, Romney, Edwards, Giuliani)
>  
>  The media limn John McCain as a "war hero," a  Navy
> lighter pilot who was shot down while flying
> his 23rd mission over  North Vietnam.  He was
> captured and was a Prisoner of War for five years in
>  Hanoi, North Vietnam.  I don't know what's "heroic"
> about flying a     er  and being shot down.  Most
> war veterans would lament "Flying  missions was his
> JOB." 
>  
>  Not unlike John Kerry, he has stubbornly  refused
> to authorize the release of his official records.
> The two of them  together have repeatedly blocked
> Senate efforts to find or account for American  POWs
> and MIAs for going on 35 years now.  Have you never
> wondered why you  haven't seen any Hanoi Hilton POWs
> interviewed on television and tell of their
> captivity with John McCain, who was also there?
> Some have wanted to be  publicly interviewed, and
> some have been, but not on mainstream network
> television.  McCain doesn't want them telling the
> public that they only saw  him twice, because he
> allegedly had what they called "VIP quarters and
> special  accommodations" separate from theirs.  Some
> allege that he was never         d because he
> willingly gave the enemy information about American
> operations, flight patterns, maneuver tactics, etc.
>
>  
>  Once, I believe when Jane Fonda visited, he was
> photographed in the Navy's dress white uniform.
> Wonder how he got that  uniform while in an enemy
> prison camp?  Surely he didn't have it  conveniently
> hanging in the plane he was flying when he was shot
> down.
>  
>  The  True John McCain – June 2007 video interview
> with Colonel  Hopper
>
>
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_hopper_video.htm
>  
>   John  McCain: The Manchurian Candidate?
>
>
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_tedmancurin.htm
>  
>   The  War Secrets Senator John McCain Hides
>
>
http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/cin_secretworldofmccain.htm
>  
>   The media want McCain to win the nomination, so
> they can THEN (they're "pushing" him NOW)destroy
> him and give Hillary the key to the Oral Office,
> which will immediately be  re-dubbed "The Ovary
> Office."  Either way, it will be the  KGB's Western
> Office, as both are Communists.
>  
>  Readers, do some research of your  own.  I have
> only scratched the surface in this short  treatise.
>  
>  Soviet Premier Nikita Kruschev said, back in  the
> 1960's, that the Soviets would conquer the United
> States without firing a  shot.  What better way to
> accomplish that than to have a KGB agent elected
> president of the United States?  Did we go through
> all those years of  the Cold War just to hand our
> country over to them on a silver  platter?
>  
>  The War in Iraq
>  
>  Marine Corps Major General Smedley Butler  was
> right….war is a [profitable] racket, with the
> profit going to  mega-corporations and the cost of
> goods sold being paid for in soldiers' lives  and
> limbs.
>  
>   Excerpt from a speech delivered in 1933, by  Major
> General Smedley Butler, USMC.   War is just a
> racket. A racket is best    described, I believe, as
> something that is not what it seems to the majority
>   of people. Only a small inside group knows what it
> is about. It is conducted    for the benefit of the
> very few at the expense of the masses.    I believe
> in adequate defense at the coastline    and nothing
> else. If a nation comes over here to fight, then
> we'll fight. The    trouble with America is that
> when the dollar only earns 6 percent over here,  
> then it gets restless and goes overseas to get 100
> percent. Then the flag    follows the dollar and the
> soldiers follow the flag.    I wouldn't go to war
> again as I have done to    protect some lousy
> investment of the bankers. There are only two  
> things we should fight for. One is the defense of
> our homes and the other is    the Bill of Rights.
> War for any other reason is simply a racket.     
> There isn't a trick in
>  the racketeering bag    that the military gang is
> blind to. It has its "finger men" to point out  
> enemies, its "muscle men" to destroy enemies, its
> "brain men" to plan war    preparations, and a "Big
> Boss" Super-Nationalistic-Capitalism